Sunday, November 11, 2012

Frogs and Water Pollution



It is well known by now that frogs are great indicators of environmental changes because of their skin. Every element of nature that they come into contact with, they are affected by. Atrazine found in water can alter the internal reproductive organs in male frogs. There are two other water pollutants that are a cause of concern for frogs: birth control pill and parasites. 

Every time someone takes birth control or other forms of estrogen such as skin creams and prostate cancer medication, they are excreting the chemicals through their urine and into waste water or other ground water resources. For a long time it was thought that only Atrazine, the herbicide used in farming, was the only culprit for finding male frogs containing both testes and ovaries. This is not true. A study done in various water resources around Connecticut are proving that birth control is another contributing factor found in our water that is polluting our frogs’ fragile bodies. 

Ecologist and associate dean at Yale University, David Skelly, is heading the research being done in Connecticut to understand why birth control is getting into water resources. During Skelly’s research he found that frogs living “in agricultural areas, only 7 percent of the frogs show these deformities” and frogs in “urban and suburban areas, it’s about 20 percent” (Burgeson, 2010). This is important because it means that birth control and estrogen medication is a problem for frogs living in urban and suburban areas. 

When medications are being disposed of either through the body or being flushed in whole down the toilet, they are not always finding their way to sewer systems where they can be treated and eliminated from drinking water. John Herlihy, director of water quality and environmental management for Aquarion Water Co,. states that “it’s because those water bodies are receiving wastewater discharge” (Burgeson, 2010). This means that there are flaws in the water treatment that ends up in the groundwater or drinking water. When we add medication to the mix, it is extremely hard to eliminate every single chemical because it would be awfully expensive for cities to do so. In addition, water treatment centers are not aware of what people are flushing down the toilet and that is why they campaign and stress to people to not do so. 

            One way the EPA is trying to do their best by removing estrogen in drinking water is by adding chlorine or powdered activated carbon (Burgeson, 2010). This is not the best way to go about but so far it is one of the only few alternatives until either other forms of birth control are used or other alternatives are found to do away with estrogen in our water which harms our frogs. Skelly brings up a good point when he mentions that “we could end up medicating the natural world, and even re-medicating ourselves” (Burgeson, 2010).  Those humans who do not take estrogen medications should not be introduced to it through their drinking water and nor should our frogs reproductive organs be in jeopardy.    

Another alarming introduction to our water source is the introduction of harmful parasites that are deforming our four legged amphibians. In various water sources in Minnesota and the Midwest, there is an increase of a specific snail species that is a host to a parasite called trematodes. The increase of snail population is due to nitrogen and phosphorus used in farming sites. Trematodes are harmful to the frogs because “larvae burrow into tadpole limb regions and form cysts that disrupt normal frog and toad leg development, causing extra or missing limbs” (Johnson, 2012). Missing limbs, extra limbs or deformed limbs are hazardous to the frogs’ survival because if they cannot escape from their prey, they will decline at a faster rate. Or vice versa, if they cannot hunt for food because they are not fast enough they will starve to death. 

The life cycle of the trematodes is serious. An increase of snails means a decline in frog population. As the frogs who are deformed fall victim to prey by birds, the birds then excrete the parasite and then find their way to a host and the cycle starts all over again (Johnson, 2012).
On a lighter note, there is some good that frogs can do to help the environment without losing their life or altering internal organs. In countries where there is very little financial assistance to help protect, preserve or control water quality, frogs are now seen as a safe alternative to test unsafe polluted drinking water.

Dr. Tyrone Hayes has discovered that in Ethiopia and Uganda the reed frog in males’ skin changes when the water quality is poor. The males are normally green but took the appearance of the females.  Thousands of experiments were conducted on frogs to prove Dr. Hayes theory that “During the metamorphosis from tadpole to adult, frogs are very sensitive to changes in their environment, including chemicals in the water or their food supply. So the changes in coloration indicated that the frogs’ extremely thin, sensitive skin was reacting to the contaminants in the water” (National Geographic). Dr. Hayes was correct and had an idea for developing countries to test their water.

The reed frogs could be a low-cost solution to countries where lack of government assistance or environmental organizations can test the quality of water. If the local people raise the frogs and observe color changes in male frogs, then they would know that the water has pollution, plastic by-products, pesticides or synthetic hormones (National Geographic). This could be a good solution provided the only adverse effect to the frogs is just color change and nothing else that would lead them to extinction.



Sources:

Burgeson, J. (2010, Feburary 28). For frogs, and perhaps humans, there’s something strange in the water. Retrieved from http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/For-frogs-and-perhaps-humans-there-s-384390.php

Johnson, P. (2012, May 22). Richer parasite diversity leads to healthier frogs, says new cu study. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/news/features/richer-parasite-diversity-leads-healthier-frogs-says-new-cu-study  

National Geographic. (n.d.). Explorers bios- tyrone hayes . Retrieved from http://www.nationalgeographic.com/explorers/bios/tyrone-hayes/ 

1 comment: