Monday, October 8, 2012

Frogs and Aquaculture

    

There is another danger to the frog population that many humans need to become aware of. Almost every culture around the world has some variation of a food delicacy and on the French and Asian menus frog legs are the most popular dish. Many environmentalists estimate that certain frogs in various locations may be declining because of human consumption of frogs. In France, it is estimated that 120 million frogs are consumed each year and in California during the late 19th century, the miners almost ate the red legged frog to extinction (Kriger, 2008-2001). The bullfrog is in high demand because of their large size and they provide the amount of meat required to be considered consumable. Over the recent years, frog farming has becoming increasingly popular but not very successful in the overall health and population of frogs.
Aquaculture is the growing of aquatic species in net pens or tanks (Cunningham & Cunningham, 2012). Just as fish are being farmed raised, frogs are too for a few reasons like education, science, and medical advances. Overall, the main reason why anyone would start a frog farm is so they can make a profit exporting/importing the frogs as food. This may seem like a winning solution to help keep frogs from becoming extinct but many will argue that frog aquaculture is actually quite the opposite. 
For example, it is proven that those who live in Virginia are not successful at frog farming. Changing climate temperatures play a part of the failure because frogs need ideal stable conditions to mature. In Virginia and most places around the world, most of the farmers happen to exist near a habitat that frogs are already living naturally in the wild and are being sold for profit. By taking a frog from its natural habitat is aiding the decline of the frog population. The time it takes a bullfrog from conception to reach full adulthood size is three years. The food supply is demanding for adult sized bullfrogs because it takes 1.15 pounds of live food to feed a 0.4 pound bullfrog with marketable legs ("Frog farming, fact," 2004). This is a problem because adult frogs become carnivores and will eat younger vulnerable frogs when needed.
When frogs are the products of import/export around the world they are either shipped frozen or live. Biologist Brian Gratwicke of the Smithsonian Institution's National Zoo in Washington, D.C. agrees that when frogs are shipped live, especially in the United States, it causes the environment a greater harm as the frogs have a higher potential to carry disease and become an invasive species. The chances of spreading disease are slightly lower if the frogs are shipped frozen in clean, disease free water (Holden, 2009). 
Two diseases that farm raised frogs have are chytrid and red-legged disease. Red-legged disease is a bacterial infection and brought upon by overcrowded frog populations. If the frogs are farm raised, they are not getting the space they need to roam free and if one frog is infected with chytrid, then more than likely all the others will be too because the water supply will have chytrid. Bullfrogs are carriers of the chytrid disease even though they are immune. In addition, when the live frogs either escape or get let go because they might not be suitable for the buyer, they are now considered an invasive species in at least 15 other countries (Kriger, 2008-2001). They will eat "native frogs, birds, bats, snakes and other wildlife, and spread diseases" (Kriger, 2008-2001). Shipping infected frogs across the world is not good practice and is troublesome for the survival of other species. 
In France, because they have almost eaten all their native frog species to extinction, they have made it illegal to eat their own frogs. France now has to import frogs from other countries such as China, Indonesia, India, Philippians, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and Bangladeshi. Yet, all the mentioned countries are banned from selling except Bangladeshi, because the frogs contain salmonella (FDA, 2011). 
Overall, the frog trade market is not good for any country. The use of aquaculture is not a solution to saving the frogs from extinction or disease. The only way these tiny creatures can survive is if humans are to leave them alone and not consume them as food. Let nature do its job just as she has done for the past 180 million years.



Sources:

Cunningham, W., & Cunningham, M. A. (2012). Environmental science a global concern. (12 ed., pp. 159-167). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.

FDA. (2011, October 06). "detention without physical examination of frog legs". Retrieved from         http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_24.html 

Frog farming, fact or fiction?. (2004, March). Retrieved from http://mdc.mo.gov/sites/default/files/resources/2010/05/4899_2850.pdf 

Helfrich, L. (2009, MAY 01). Commercial frog farming. Retrieved from http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/420/420-255/420-255.html 

Holden, C. (2009, Nov. 23). Trade in frog legs may spread disease. Retrieved from http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2009/11/23-02.html 

Kriger, K. (2008-2001). The problem with frog legs. Retrieved from http://www.savethefrogs.com/actions/frog-legs/